Workflow
Sector diversification
icon
搜索文档
IWO Offers Broader Diversification but Slower Growth Than VOOG
The Motley Fool· 2025-12-17 04:55
Explore how sector mix and company size shape the risk and diversification profiles of these two growth-focused ETFs.Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG +0.16%) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO 0.26%) differ sharply on cost, volatility, and portfolio makeup, with VOOG offering lower expenses and a tech tilt, while IWO brings broader diversification and small-cap growth exposure.VOOG tracks large-cap U.S. growth stocks in the S&P 500, making it a staple for investors seeking blue chip growth exposure. ...
VOOG vs. MGK: Tech Exposure is Key
Yahoo Finance· 2025-12-14 07:41
基金概况与比较 - Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF 和 Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF 均旨在为投资者提供美国大盘成长股的投资敞口,但前者专注于市场中最大的公司,后者则在标普500成长股部分覆盖更广[4] - 两只基金均由Vanguard管理,费用率相同,均为0.07%,且都不使用杠杆或其他结构性设计[1][3][4][6] - 两只基金都重仓一些公开市场上最大的公司[6] 投资组合构成与集中度 - MGK的投资组合更为集中,仅持有66只股票,而VOOG持有217只股票,是前者的三倍多[1][2][5] - MGK的资产有69%集中于科技板块,其前三大持仓——英伟达、苹果和微软——合计占投资组合的38%以上[1] - VOOG的资产有44%配置于科技公司,通信服务和消费周期性行业也分别占15%和12%[2] - VOOG的前三大持仓为英伟达、微软和苹果,分别占资产的15.3%、6.2%和5.7%[2] - 虽然英伟达是两只基金的最大持仓,约占管理资产的15%,但微软和苹果在MGK中的合计权重高于在VOOG中的权重[7] 关键差异与投资者考量 - 两只基金的核心区别在于对科技板块的敞口程度,MGK的科技敞口显著更高[5][7][8] - MGK更集中的投资组合导致其可能更容易受到科技板块波动的影响[1] - VOOG由于持股更广泛、行业更多元,目前避免了集中的行业或单一股票风险[2] - 在股息收益率方面,VOOG略高于MGK[3]
VGT vs. SOXX: Should Investors Choose a Broad Tech ETF or a Niche Semiconductor Fund?
The Motley Fool· 2025-12-13 19:00
Expense-conscious investors and those seeking sector diversification may find key differences between these two popular tech ETFs.The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX 4.78%) and the Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT 2.89%) take different approaches to tech investing -- SOXX focuses solely on semiconductors, while VGT offers broader exposure to technology hardware, software, and services.Both funds provide access to high-growth tech companies. SOXX zeroes in on a concentrated slice of the chip industry ...