公司业务与定位 - 公司是一家时尚租赁服务提供商，允许客户租赁设计师服装和配饰 [1] - 公司旨在通过提供传统零售的可持续替代方案来革新时尚产业 [1] - 公司在时尚和生活方式领域的竞争对手包括ThredUp Inc和Allbirds, Inc [1] 核心财务指标分析 - 公司的投入资本回报率为-39.57%，远高于其6.54%的加权平均资本成本 [2] - ROIC与WACC的比率为-6.05，表明公司产生的回报不足以覆盖其资本成本 [2] 同行业公司比较 - 竞争对手ThredUp Inc的ROIC为-18.82%，WACC为11.66%，ROIC与WACC比率为-1.61，其财务表现优于公司 [3] - 竞争对手Allbirds, Inc的ROIC为-80.40%，WACC为7.75%，ROIC与WACC比率为-10.37，其财务表现逊于公司 [4] - 竞争对手Warby Parker Inc的ROIC为-3.46%，WACC为13.06%，ROIC与WACC比率为-0.26，在同行中最接近盈亏平衡点 [5] 综合表现评估 - 与同行ThredUp Inc和Allbirds, Inc相比，公司在ROIC与WACC比率方面表现不佳 [6] - Warby Parker Inc在资本利用效率方面表现最佳，最接近盈亏平衡 [6]

Ciena Corporation (NYSE:CIEN) is a global supplier of telecommunications networking equipment, software, and services. The company is known for its innovative solutions in optical networking and data center interconnect. Ciena competes with other technology firms like Juniper Networks, Corning Incorporated, NetApp, Extreme Networks, and Lufax Holding Ltd in the telecommunications and networking industry.Ciena's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is 3.79%, which is notably lower than its Weighted Average Cost ...

公司概况与商业模式 - Goosehead Insurance Inc 是保险行业的知名企业，以创新方式提供个人保险产品 [1] - 公司通过特许经营和公司自有代理网络运营，利用技术提升客户体验并简化运营 [1] 核心财务指标分析 - Goosehead Insurance 的投入资本回报率为14.63%，加权平均资本成本为9.74%，两者比值为1.50 [2][6] - 该财务指标表明公司有效创造了超过其资本成本的回报 [2] 同业公司比较 - Live Oak Bancshares Inc 的投入资本回报率为4.52%，加权平均资本成本为32.88%，两者比值仅为0.14 [3] - Kinsale Capital Group Inc 的投入资本回报率为10.64%，加权平均资本成本为9.02%，两者比值为1.18 [4] - Hamilton Lane Incorporated 的投入资本回报率为18.05%，加权平均资本成本为9.37%，两者比值达1.93，为同业最高 [5] 综合表现评估 - 与同业公司相比，Goosehead Insurance 展示了卓越的资本使用效率，其投入资本回报率与加权平均资本成本比值优于Live Oak Bancshares Inc和Kinsale Capital Group Inc [6] - Hamilton Lane Incorporated 在同业比较中表现突出，其最高的投入资本回报率与加权平均资本成本比值表明其为投资者提供了极高的增长潜力 [6]

ZipRecruiter's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of -5.32% indicates it is not generating sufficient returns to cover its cost of capital.Clear Secure, Inc. (NYSE:YOU) stands out with a ROIC of 100.50%, significantly outperforming its peers.Both TaskUs, Inc. (NASDAQ:TASK) and FIGS, Inc. (NYSE:FIGS) show positive ROIC figures, though they still face challenges in surpassing their cost of capital.ZipRecruiter, Inc. (NYSE:ZIP) is a prominent online employment marketplace that connects job seekers with employer ...

公司概况与行业背景 - Motorsport Games Inc (MSGM) 是一家专注于开发和发行赛车视频游戏的公司 [1] - 公司属于更广泛的游戏行业，其竞争对手包括 Genius Group Limited (GNS)、Versus Systems Inc (VS)、Cosmos Health Inc (COSM)、Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL) 和 Mobile Global Esports Inc (MGAM) [1] - 对这些公司的评估主要基于其财务指标，特别是投资资本回报率 (ROIC) 和加权平均资本成本 (WACC) [1] Motorsport Games Inc (MSGM) 资本效率分析 - MSGM 的 ROIC 为 -28.03%，WACC 为 13.73%，ROIC 与 WACC 比率为 -2.04 [2] - 该比率表明公司产生的回报不足以覆盖其资本成本 [2] - 负的 ROIC 相较于 WACC 意味着公司的投资正在损失价值 [2] 同业公司比较分析 - Genius Group Limited (GNS) 的 ROIC 为 -29.47%，WACC 为 25.16%，比率为 -1.17，其资本效率状况略优于 MSGM 但仍为负值 [3] - Versus Systems Inc (VS) 的 ROIC 为 -47.17%，WACC 为 16.17%，比率为 -2.92，其资本使用效率低于 MSGM [4] - Cosmos Health Inc (COSM) 的 ROIC 为 -33.52%，WACC 为 17.85%，比率为 -1.88，略优于 MSGM 但同样为负 [4] - Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL) 的 ROIC 为 -7.64%，WACC 为 15.98%，比率为 -0.48，在同业中最接近覆盖其资本成本 [5] - Mobile Global Esports Inc (MGAM) 的 ROIC 为 -351.37%，WACC 为 4.64%，比率为 -75.66，显示出最严重的资本利用低效问题 [5]

公司资本效率分析 - CF Bankshares Inc (CFBK) 的投入资本回报率(ROIC)为-1.19% 远低于其24.98%的加权平均资本成本(WACC) 显示资本使用效率严重低下 [2] - CFBK的ROIC与WACC比值为-0.048 表明公司未能有效利用资本创造回报 [2] 同业比较分析 - Citizens Community Bancorp (CZWI) ROIC为0.80% WACC为18.82% 比值为0.042 虽为正值但仍显示资本利用效率偏低 [3] - Colony Bankcorp (CBAN) ROIC为-0.63% WACC为12.69% 比值为-0.050 与CFBK类似存在资本效率问题 [3] - Community West Bancshares (CWBC) ROIC达4.54% WACC为11.57% 比值为0.392 资本效率表现良好 [4] - C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) ROIC为6.28% WACC为13.55% 比值0.463为同业最高 资本回报效率最优 [4][5] 行业竞争格局 - 行业竞争对手包括Citizens Community Bancorp、Colony Bankcorp、Community West Bancshares、Citizens Holding Company及C&F Financial Corporation等金融机构 [1] - 行业普遍采用ROIC与WACC比较来衡量资本配置效率 [1]

Marchex, Inc. (NASDAQ:MCHX) is a company that specializes in call analytics and call tracking solutions, helping businesses connect, drive, and convert more customers. Despite its innovative services, Marchex faces challenges in financial efficiency. The company's Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -15.82%, which is significantly lower than its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 12.69%. This negative ROIC indicates that Marchex is not generating returns above its cost of capital, a concerning sign ...

ADC Therapeutics S.A. struggles with capital efficiency, having a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of -54.62% versus its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 20.44%.Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM) show more favorable financial positions, with Sanmina achieving a ROIC that exceeds its WACC.COMSovereign Holding Corp. (COMS), Altair Engineering Inc. (ALTR), and ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. (ADTN) also face challenges in capital efficiency, with COMS showing severe inefficiencies.ADC The ...

Kaspi.kz boasts a remarkable ROIC of 41.90% significantly higher than its WACC of 4.59%.Comparatively, its competitors have lower ROIC to WACC ratios, indicating less efficiency in generating returns from invested capital.Kaspi.kz stands out with the highest ROIC to WACC ratio among its peers, showcasing superior capital utilization and return generation.Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz (LSE:KSPI) is a prominent financial technology company based in Kazakhstan. It offers a range of services including payments, ...

SANUWAVE Health, Inc. (OTC:SNWV) is a pioneering company in the field of regenerative medicine, focusing on the development and commercialization of non-invasive, high-energy, acoustic pressure shockwave technology. This innovative approach is applied in wound care, orthopedics, and other medical fields, setting SANUWAVE apart in a competitive landscape. The company's financial metrics, particularly its Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), highlight its efficiency a ...